Skip to main content.

Sunday, May 28, 2006

Thanks to Rob Dougherty of Stupidslab for sending out a news story in the Denver Post that has explosive implications for toll roads across the country.

In the story, highly placed toll road officials admit to what sounds like fraud on the bond market.

The Denver Post story is about more than tollroads that fail to meet their financial projections. That's no secret and is a story we have posted about many times here and here and here.

No, in this story, people like Steve Hogan admit to having inflated financial projections by as much as 25%:

Its director, Aurora City Councilman Steve Hogan, said that before seeking outside investors in the road, he didn't believe the optimistic forecasts for its profit potential. But, he said, he treated those estimates as a tool to persuade bond experts to give the debt a favorable rating, not as a solid predictor.

"My personal opinion was that the numbers were probably a little high," said Hogan, who thought the projections for the critical, early years could be as much as 25 percent above the mark. He expected bond raters to trim the revenue estimates and base their ratings for investors on more realistic projections, but they did not.

While Hogan apparently sees this as a game, the SEC would call it something else.

In 1994, the SEC first warned that anyone selling municipal bonds should make sure they were giving potential investors the full picture.

"Municipal dealers must have a reasonable basis for recommending the purchase of securities," the SEC said.

Former SEC enforcement attorney David Zisser said the federal agency could easily become concerned about the failure of a tolling authority to disclose doubts about their revenue forecasts.

Hogan's admission that he doubted the numbers struck rating-agencies analysts as surprising. Analysts said they expected good-faith, rigorous estimates.

"It's interesting to actually hear an open acknowledgment of it, because when we sit here, we wonder if that's going on," said Tom Paolicelli, a senior analyst at Moody's, one of three agencies that gave the parkway strong initial ratings. "We wonder if there is an inflation because they expect us to cut (the revenue estimate) down."

Hogan excuses the overstatements by saying that they saved taxpayers money.

Hogan says he's thankful the toll road managed to save $20 million in construction costs it set aside as a rainy-day fund.

"If we hadn't done that, we would have been in trouble," he said. "Big, big trouble. There's no two ways around that."

Hogan is saying that had they not grossly inflated the figures the citizens might have been in big, big trouble, meaning the toll roads would never have been built. But with admissions like this Hogan might find that "we" who is in trouble is far more personal.

The Denver Post story today is the first in a three-part series.

Update by em: Front page image of the May 28, 2006 edition of The Sunday Denver Post

Comments

11 comments

[1]
This Denver Post article is an eye-opener! If you have any doubts about whether to read it, take my word for it: it's worth reading. Even I, cynic that I am, had no idea the system was so corrupt.

When consultants make estimates of how much revenue a toll road will generate, the probability is zero that they will be correct to the exact dollar.

But if their revenue estimates are unbiased, then the estimates will be too low about half the time, and too high about half the time.

However, according to this article, 86 percent (19 out of 22) of the estimates were too high. This strongly suggests something is fishy. And the article explains why. In a nutshell, there's money to be made if revenue projections come in high enough to cause the bonds to sell.

This situation stinks to high heaven!

Posted by BobB at Sunday, May 28, 2006 09:00:03

[2]
Folks may also wat to check out the companion article on the Northwest Parkway, http://www.denverpost.com/n...

Which discusses the conflict of interest and patronage surrounding this boondoggle. We got no bid contracts, promised future jobs, oh! and condemnation of private property by a Private-Public enterprise in this one.

Posted by April B at Sunday, May 28, 2006 09:01:30

[3]
That would be Steve Hogan, the former director of Colorado E470, which was the focus of Unbossed's Road Scholars series last summer >> http://www.unbossed.com/ind...

Is it any wonder, when we tried to investigate the NW Parkway, which is now under his direction, that the crack Unbossed investigative team was stymied every time?

I think it's time to start pushing that Colorado Records request again. Methinks there are a whole lot of questionable deals and fuzzy math here worthy of a second look.

Kudos to Denver Post reporter Chuck Plunkett can be sent here >> cplunkett AT denverpost DOT com.

Posted by em dash at Sunday, May 28, 2006 09:32:19

[4]
April, it is so odd to see the sunny photos of people who Love Love Love the NW Tollway next to a story about the shenanigans involved in building it.

Posted by shirah at Sunday, May 28, 2006 10:51:31

[5]
It appears Steve Hogan has a history of playing fast and loose with the facts.

Mr. Hogan's response on Denver Post columnist Al Lewis' blog following a January 1, 2006 story on E470 tolls.

column >> http://www.denverpost.com/b...
blog >> http://www.denverpostblogho...

***************************************

Dear Mr. Lewis –

Here are just a couple of facts that might have been overlooked in the actions of some to complain about the choice of paying tolls verses driving on slower, more congested roads.

The Northwest Parkway never had any non-compete agreements. The Parkway never considered them, never asked for them, and never will. Please don’t throw us in with the “congestion by design" theory.

The average number of daily transactions on the Northwest Parkway is 23% higher this January than last January, even with a mainline toll increase of 25 cents. Oh yes, that January number is over 10,000 a day, even with those low traveled Sundays. And January is the lowest traveled month of the year for the Parkway.

Finally, there are no tax dollars in the Northwest Parkway, and no one is forced to drive on the Northwest Parkway. Given the location of the road, it is reasonable for people to choose whether they want to pay a toll and experience speed, safety, consistency and convenience, or choose the alternative of sometimes congested roads.

While I understand concerns over the theory of congestion by design, that really isn’t the case in Colorado. Check on the facts of the Commerce City situation rather than the headlines. For example, if it were true, E-470 would have had a lot more traffic much sooner, and would not have had to raise tolls. The simple facts overwhelm the theory.

If people don’t like toll roads, they don’t have to drive on them. The choice is theirs, and they do have a choice.

By the way have you noticed that the Chicago Skyway toll road was purchased by the private sector last year for about $1.8 billion, and there has been an offer from the private sector to buy the Indiana Toll Road for over $3.8 billion?

It looks like part of the impact of not enough tax dollars for states and local governments to build roads is resulting in roads reverting to the private sector. Might that issue be more important than the relative cost of the choice between a toll and a Starbucks?

Sincerely,

Steve Hogan

Steve Hogan
Executive Director
Northwest Parkway Public Highway Authority
3701 Northwest Parkway
Broomfield, CO 80020

Comment by Steve Hogan — February 1, 2006 @ 12:16 pm

***************************************

Posted by em dash at Sunday, May 28, 2006 18:22:00

[6]
Mr. Hogan's claim that there are no public tax dollars in the NW Parkway project are completely contradicted by the companion Denver Post story in today's paper which April linked to above.

***************************************

The city bought land and built underpasses and ramps for the Interlocken Loop and provided other services. It pledged nearly $53 million in new sales and property taxes to make the improvements and hoped to recover that money in two ways: an immediate $4 million from the Northwest Parkway's bond sale; and the remaining $48 million from the parkway's tolls.

In June 1998, Broomfield, other cities and the Interlocken developers established a nonprofit organization to attempt the Northwest Parkway project. The group used state laws created in the mid-1980s by proponents of the E-470 toll road to become the Northwest Parkway Public Highway Authority.

As a public-private partnership with state-granted governmental powers, the new authority gained two important tools: the ability to condemn land and the ability to sell tax-exempt revenue bonds.

****************************************

Posted by em dash at Sunday, May 28, 2006 18:24:00

[7]
I tried to locate the transcript Em Rosa took of the hearing held in early August 2005 at which Hogan was grilled. I think he said some things there that might be relevant. I can't find it though.

Posted by shirah at Sunday, May 28, 2006 18:29:57

[8]
As to Mr. Hogan's blog comment that the NW Parkway never considered or employed non-compete agreements as he had instituted as the former director of E-470, it has been impossible to confirm or deny his assertion.

First, we refused to turn over the public documents.

Then, he insisted that the documents could only be reviewed by Unbossed investigators at the NW Parkway offices only during ascribed office hours.

Later, he claimed the estimated 500 pages of requested records could be obtained at a cost of $1/photocopied page.

Lastly, updated financial statements and board minutes were removed from the NW Parkway PUBLIC Highway Authority webpage.

Expect a phone call this week, Mr. Hogan. I'll be making an appointment.

Posted by em dash at Sunday, May 28, 2006 18:33:23

[9]
Live blog of the August 11, 2005 Colorado Transportation Legislative Review Committee proceedings >> http://unbossed.com/index.p...

EMRosa's notes from the same hearing >>

My Day At The Capital, or, How I Learned To Stop Worrying About Privatization and Love Non-compete Clauses
http://emrosa.blogspot.com/...

Transportation Legislation Review Committee: Bare Bones
http://emrosa.blogspot.com/...

Posted by em dash at Sunday, May 28, 2006 18:39:53

[10]
Snarky I know but the editor in me can't resist this delicious rimshot.

From the NW Parkway Public Authority home page >> http://www.northwestparkway...

****************************************
The Northwest Parkway is a 70-mile per hour toll road that SEEMLESSLY connects the Parkway with E-470 at north I-25, and with U.S. 36 and State Highway 128 in Broomfield. It is Colorado's newest improvement to the state's transportation system.
***************************************

Yeah, "seemless" is one way of describing the tollroad.

Posted by em dash at Sunday, May 28, 2006 18:49:05

[11]
In Steve Hogan's letter in [5] above he says, "While I understand concerns over the theory of congestion by design, that really isn’t the case in Colorado. Check on the facts of the Commerce City situation rather than the headlines. For example, if it were true, E-470 would have had a lot more traffic much sooner, and would not have had to raise tolls. The simple facts overwhelm the theory."

Is he saying that the non-compete contracts didn't exist because there is little evidence that they worked? What kind of bizarre logic is that? Commerce City acknowledges that they exist. They provided showed them to Bob in Loveland. They put up the stop lights and speed limit signs required by the contract. In Aug. 2005 Hogan admitted to the Transportation Legislation Review Committee that it happened. See the link in [5] above. That's when he made the famous statement that "it was just a financial thing." Wow, even for a politician this guy is full of it.

Posted by Rob Dougherty at Wednesday, May 31, 2006 20:14:08

Add Comment

This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it

Buy Viagra