Skip to main content.

Friday, September 16, 2005

Five years ago, my friend Josh and I decided that we wanted to break into the raver community. It was the weekend of Halloween 2000 and we were determined to make it to a party -- any party. Without a car, we were entirely dependent on the kindness of strangers. But Josh managed to find us a ride and, as I smooshed into the backseat of a vehicle driven by people I didn't even know, I started to feel the first tingles of anticipation.

Almost 2 hours later, after countless wrong turns and ridiculous attempts to find out the location of the party, we finally found ourselves in a darkened corner of one of San Francisco's many warehouse districts. But the darkness was quickly dispelled by several flashing red and blue lights. The police had arrived to destroy our fun -- before we even got in the door.

As the years passed since that evening, I would come to find that the cops were not an uncommon (albeit uninvited) guest at many parties. Sometimes it would happen like I described it above -- I'd never even make it in the door. Other times, I was just beginning to break a sweat on the dance floor. But, even if a party goes off without a hitch, the fear of police descending on a party is ever present.

Before Hurricane Katrina gave the media something to REALLY sensationalize, there was a little stir about a party in Utah. By far the most over-the-top shutdown of a rave I have ever read about, this attack has been labeled "fascistic" -- and for good reason. Just watch the video at the bottom of the link if you have any doubts.

Before you start thinking that police brutality and unreasonable action against party-goers are yet another thing we can blame the Bush administration for (despite how tempting and fun that sounds), check out this article on a party in the Czech Republic that met with similar riot-gear-enrobed police. See? It's not just endemic to the good ol' U.S. of A.

So what's going on here? Why is law enforcement so keen to shut down these events with an overwhelming use of force? After all, a rave with a permit is no more or less "illegal" than your garden variety nightclub, and you don't see too many Robocops pounding down the doors of clubs, do you? What is it about a party that makes it so much more attractive to the fascistic, paramilitary wing of the government? They could be out stopping murder, rape or thievery. Instead, they're handcuffing and beating party-goers, confiscating records and electronic equipment and destroying the spirit of the youth. Why do they want to shut down the fun?

These are the questions I'd like to address over the following weeks. I will be talking about dance music, its history, the culture of hedonism (always an enjoyable topic) and drugs and why these -- in the guise of the rave -- pose such a threat to governments the world over. Unless, of course, another hurricane gets in the way.

Comments

8 comments

[1]
Great post, morpheme, and I'm glad you brought up that Utah incident again -- I had sort of forgotten about it in all that followed.

I'm a veteran of some pretty brutal incidents in Los Angeles back during the late-70's punk days some strictly music and others more political protest -- it always seemed to me that they took this stuff really personal, like a direct challenge.

I guess as defenders of the status quo in the most elemental of ways, they take movements that challenge it pretty seriously, although probably unconsciously. Whenever they'd show up and start bashing heads, I just felt that they were enraged somehow by our existence.

I never saw anything like it in the US until I saw the raw footage of the WTO riots -- are ravers connected with any sort of political philosophy such as anti-corporate globalization?

Posted by Izzy at Friday, September 16, 2005 19:21:23

[2]
Izzy -- I'm going to address "the political philosphy of ravers" in future posts. For now, let me just say that there are no definitive politics per se but that the code phrase of ravers has been PLUR -- peace, love, unity, respect. Pretty much a blanket motto, but you can see how that would echo the "peace and love, man" of the 60s. We're not talking so much about a specific political bent so much as a philosophy on life and all that entails.

Posted by morpheme at Friday, September 16, 2005 20:06:21

[3]
Peace, love, unity, respect -- yep, definitely troublemakers. Gotta nip that crap right in the bud! ;-)

Seriously, that is very political, even if it seems like just a philosophy -- it's stated because what we have is something different. From the philosophy springs the activists. All politics has an underlying philosophy.

Posted by Izzy at Friday, September 16, 2005 20:35:26

[4]
Hate to break up a great conversation with something mundane, but here goes. Welcome to unbossed, morpheme. We're glad to include a new perspective.

Politics abounds here, even in music.

A - alligators around . . . P - PLUR potentiates.

Posted by shirah at Friday, September 16, 2005 21:13:03

[5]
Yes, welcome! Jeesh, where are my manners? Thanks, shirah!

And you'll have to forgive me morpheme -- I was raised by Scots. EVERYTHING was politics and skulduggery! And I LOVE talking politics and music -- hugely political!

From the banning of the pipes in the highlands, to the banning of the drums in the slave states, music and art have long been used as political weapons. It's great to have you onboard! I think this'll be fun.

Posted by Izzy at Friday, September 16, 2005 21:23:37

[6]
Welcome, morpheme!

I've always wondered why certain segments of American life still cling to such a priggish and austere Puritanical philosophy.

Could the over-bearing police response to raves be caused not by concerns for public safety or property rights but by our nation's overriding culture of fear of sexuality, of youth, etc., that demands controlling the bacchanalian joy that they cannot or will not allow themselves to feel?

Posted by em dash at Friday, September 16, 2005 21:38:25

[7]
Izzy -- I promise I'll get to the politics of PLUR at some point in this series. Soon...soon. Next up is a historical perspective (because, really, how else can I set the tone?).

em dash -- Very interesting point you bring up. It is definitely the Protestant Work Ethic at, well, work. This, too, comes into play and I will most certainly address it.

Everyone -- thanks for the welcome! It's good to be writing again.

Posted by morpheme at Saturday, September 17, 2005 00:44:56

[8]
State Representative Angie Paccione has announced her candidacy for Congress from Colorado’s 4th Congressional District, and that is GOOD NEWS! Angie has shown her wisdom and insight in the State House! She is a proven leader and a person who hears all the voices of those she Represents. Won't that be nice for a change? It is the "infrastructure" that failed the people of Louisiana and New York and cost so many lives. Our highways,roads, bridges, levies, dikes, waterways, dams,hospitals, railways some of which are hundreds of years old and it real bad need of repair and replacement. Our infrastructure not only will help keep us safe against terrorists and natural diasters, but allow America to grow a strong economic base. Our military size can be reduced if we enlarge the Army Corp of Engineers and Navy Seabees and re-examine how we deal with our friends and neighbors, as if they ARE our friends and neighbors. It is time for a Congressperson who hears the cry of our farmers, working class and those who feed America and the World and have built America....Angie is that person. She is smart, wise, caring, compassionate and in my opinion just what Colorado needs in these troubled times. She understands the vital link our infrastructure plays in facing these problems tearing us apart today! Good Luck Angie and good hunting!

Posted by Richard A. Payne at Saturday, September 17, 2005 11:59:40

Add Comment

This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it

Buy Viagra