Skip to main content.

Friday, May 13, 2005

Not to shop at Mall*Wart, that is. Seems the boys from Bentonville are more than a little peeved at the prospect of not being able to build a new SuperDuperMegaGalactic Emporium o' Crap in Flagstaff, Arizona. Citizens there are considering Proposition 100, which would require a special-use permit for retail buildings bigger than 75,000 square feet--and would prohibit retail buildings larger than 125,000 square feet--in the city.

The citizens of Flagstaff are also more than a little peeved at some of the ads Wal-Mart is running in an attempt to head off the proposition. Why? Well, it might be that one of the ads sorta-kinda-almost-explicitly compares a zoning restriction on a ginormous corporate bad citizen (which already has a retail presence in Flagstaff, mind you) to the Holocaust.

Words fail me to describe exactly how galactically, off-the-fucking-charts, egregiously sick and wrong, clueless, offensive, insensitive, and just plain stupid that ad campaign is. Mall*Wart might--might--stand to lose a few bucks because it can't expand its already huge presence in Flagstaff by some 80,000 square feet, and devote 30%-40% of its floor space to grocery items. Could someone please explain to me, using really small words and some diagrams, exactly how that trifling loss (which won't even show up on the daily balance sheets of the world's biggest retailer hypocrite) is supposed to be the moral or other equivalent of the murder of six million Jews, hundreds of thousands of homosexuals, tens of thousands of priests and nuns and political dissidents?

I find it particularly offensive that the well-known homophobes from Arkansas chose to use a photograph in their ad against Proposition 100 that was pulled from the archives of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. The picture shows German students tossing books from the library of Magnus Hirschfeld's Institut für Sexualwissenschaft onto a blazing pyre in the middle of the Berlin Opernplatz in May 1933.

For those of you not familiar with Hirschfeld and his work, he founded his research institute (the first in the world to study sexual matters exclusively) in 1919. He was himself gay, and he lobbied tirelessly on behalf of gay rights in Germany, including the repeal of the notorious Paragraph 175 of the German civil code, which criminalized homosexual sex. He died in exile in France just two years after the Nazis looted his research institute, burned its library, and ransacked the files of the counseling service it ran, looking for other homosexuals to persecute. For Wal-Mart, no friend to gays and lesbians, to compare its petty little inconvenience in Flagstaff--and only a potential inconvenience at that--to the brutal repression of gays and lesbians at the hands of the Nazis is hubris on so galactic a scale that Aeschylus on his best day wouldn't have known how to work it into a tragic trilogy.

Cross-posted from Musing's musings. For other Mall*Wart antics, surf over to Wal*Mart Watch and put it in your bookmarks.

Comments

5 comments

[1]
Hmmm... let's use WalMart's logic of gigundus retail space as an argument for "consumer choice" with:

- a super-sized porn store. If I wanna buy a new vibrating toy then why should I be forced to shop in a seedy part of town? I demand freedom of choice!

- 24-hour lights ablazin' truck stop in a residential neighborhood. One never knows when the urge will hit for a Hostess Snowball and a Big Gulp. I need to know that my consumer yearnings can always be met right around the corner from my house.

- drive-thru liquor mart the size of Ikea. With states like Colorado hanging to the last vestiges of Sunday blue laws, I need to stock up the other six days of the week. I'm an American dammit and I should have 16 varieties of potato vodka crafted between the virgin thighs of young Polish women to choose from whenever I please! Anything less impinges on my rights as a consumer.

I wonder if the folks in Bentonville would agree with my logic because it doesn't seem to offer any methods for exploiting consumers, manufacturers, and marketers for WalMart's gain.

Posted by em dash at Friday, May 13, 2005 09:18:45

[2]
Didn't you know, em? All our money are belong to Mall*Wart. They're entitled to exploit us, don't'cha know?

The ironic thing, as a <a href="http://www.haloscan.com/com...">commenter over at my place</a> pointed out last night, is that the food workers' union is apparently also urging a rejection of the proposed ordinance. My guess is that they're appalled at siding with Mall*Wart, but worried that the cap on building size (and especially the 8% cap on floor space for "nontaxable grocery items") might adversely impact their own stores--and worried enough to argue for a position that helps their major (non-union) competitor more than it does them.

Posted by Michael at Friday, May 13, 2005 09:57:52

[3]
Yeah, I am really not seeing an upside for UFCW's involvement in this issue. They would have been much better served taking a neutral position. Especially in view of the monsterously offensive ads.

What's the reaction of Flagstaff's Jewish and ecumenical communities?

Posted by em dash at Friday, May 13, 2005 14:10:05

[4]
Personally, I’ve never darkened the door of a Wal-Mart much less shopped in one. Anyway, I’ve decided to avoid doing business with large corporations whenever possible. It takes some creativity and is an ever-evolving process, but you might say, for me it’s a political decision.

Also, Wal-Mart has nothing to do with preserving freedom and everything to do with profit over human beings and communities. That they would compare a legitimate restriction on their business with the Holocaust is outrageous and truly depraved.

Posted by pacifica at Friday, May 13, 2005 18:27:04

[5]
I didn't post a comment yesterday, because my response was pretty much confined to inarticulate howls.

It's a relief today to hear that there was enough of an outcry -- from UFCW, as well as the Anti-Defamation League and members of Congress -- to force the company to apologize (http://www.washingtonpost.c...). Still, the fact that several people must've thought that this ad was a good idea is deeply disturbing.

Posted by DCvote at Saturday, May 14, 2005 13:35:57

Add Comment

This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it

Buy Viagra