Skip to main content.

Thursday, March 31, 2005

When I intially agreed to join the crew at Unbossed, it was with the thought that I could somehow bridge the red state / blue state divide by providing accounts on what progressives in the Deep South are doing to combat the rabid conservatism that lurks beneath the magnolias.

This is the first year that both houses of the Georgia General Assembly and the Governorship have been controlled by the Republicans since Reconstruction. In 2002, Republicans gained the Governor's mansion and the state Senate. And In 2004, they took the House. It should be noted that both chambers had the help of a few party switchers.

With the Republicans now in control, would they fufill their much touted promise of ushering in a new era of government accountibility?

Don't make me laugh.

Yesterday was Sine Die, the end of the legislative session. After 39 days, ending one day earlier than the 40 day maximum, the Republicans have done a lot damage to this State. And while I won't burden you with all the gruesome details, here are some notable bills.

  • Hawks! - The House voted to change their rules allowing the Speaker to appoint up to three extra members at any time to any committee. If there's a hint that certain Republicans will not vote his way, he'll send in the hawks.
  • Voting Restrictions - We now have the strictest voting requirements in the country. w00t! I can't dwell on this any longer, here's the lowdown from the ACLU.
  • Secrecy Bill #1 - Allows public foundations to conceal donor names. If Mr. BigWig donates X to the County Chairman's alma mater, does his development suddenly get favorable zoning from the Commission?
  • Ethics - Ha! The House stripped the bill of the gift limit and conflict of interest provisions.
  • Secrecy Bill #2 - Allows government to negotiate in secret for proposed developments. While it did pass the house, it did not pass the Senate because the citizens called and bitched. Had the Atlanta Journal Constitution, a rag of a paper, not covered this bill extensively, I'm sure it would have passed.
  • Eminent Domain - Made it easier for the government to take yer land. Never passed either chamber due to public outrage.
  • Divorce Restrictions - Extending the waiting period for divorce AND making you take classes on the impact of divorce. Passed Senate, was not brought to the House for a vote because they ran out of time.

Now, I doubt that any of you really give a rats ass about what's going on down here. And to be honest, if I lived elsewhere, I'd be right there with you... but I do have a point. Next year, we'll have elections for Governor, Lt. Governor, Secretary of State, School Superintendent and of course, the legislature. It's do or die time for the Georgia Democratic Party since the Democratic Lt. Gov. and Secretary of State are not seeking re-election in order to fight it out in the Democratic primary for Governor. Having lost both the Governorship and School Superintendent in 2002, the Democrats are on the verge of being locked out the legislature and all state constitutional offices.

As they say in Vegas, "if you can win here, you can win anywhere." I plan on tracking the progress of the Georgia Democratic Party and various progressive organizations in their attempt to win back the state. What I hope to garner is a roadmap on what works and what doesn't work with regards to Democratic candidates in not only the South, but other red regions. You say the South is lost, I say the fight has just begun.

Comments

8 comments

[1]
It's interesting that two of these measures failed because of public opposition. Was there a lack of awareness about what was going on with the other measures, or did the public support them?

Posted by DCvote at Friday, April 01, 2005 12:30:23

[2]
I think were a couple factors. The first was definitely the coverage of the local paper. They trotted out this new section of the online version called <a href="http://www.ajc.com/opinion/...">Your Right To Know</a> where they focused on the secrecy bills and other open records issues. The other factor is that the secrecy and eminent domain bill didn't just raise the hackles of Democrats, but libertarians as well. Neil Boortz railed on these bills on his morning talk show and the Sponsor of the eminent domain bill said he was the victim of a "<i>flood of phone calls and e-mails prompted by radio talk show host Neal Boortz.</i>" A co-sponsor, who dropped his sponsorship of the bill, also blamed Boortz.

As for the rest, I think it's a combination of a) the public not being informed and b) even if they were, they didn't sufficiently care about the issue.

Posted by JenAtlanta at Friday, April 01, 2005 16:11:19

[3]
"You say the south is lost. I say the fight has just begun." --JenAtlanta

YES! I couldn't agree more, Jen, and love your fightin' spirit.

I don't know much about the south, but I know a bit about being poor and it strikes me that both issues that were done in by the public outcry were about land, a practical matter.

People in poverty can't afford to vote their ideals. They need practical help. If no one's telling them different and showing them practical applications politically, they're gonna vote for God and low taxes.

Posted by Izzy at Friday, April 01, 2005 16:34:00

[4]
It's sad that a local paper's action -- alerting its readers to what the government is doing -- is considered some kind of new initiative, but I'm glad they're doing it and hope they keep it up (and get it into the paper version).

Posted by DCvote at Friday, April 01, 2005 17:43:38

[5]
I do wish people would quit referring to this lot of repugnants as conservatives. They conserve dick ! Checks and balances mean nothing. Everything goes to enabling administration in naked power grab. The labeling is propaganda. I'm not kidding when I label them nazis. What else do you think such ruthless disregard for opposition can be ?

Posted by opit at Saturday, April 02, 2005 08:30:33

[6]
DCvote - Yeah it is pathetic. The AJC is a rather embarrassing paper. Blogs are a good way to disseminate correct information, unfortunately most people get their information from the paper or TV. A newsletter may be a better way to get information out there..

opit - I don't disagree, but I've yet to find another label that I think suits them. Though, I did refer to it as 'rabid conservatism', which hopefully paints a picture that they're not you're average conservative.

Posted by JenAtlanta at Saturday, April 02, 2005 09:40:18

[7]
I call them Neo-Confederates or Corporate Feudalists ...

Posted by Madman in the Marketplace at Saturday, April 02, 2005 11:57:29

[8]
I have to say that it"s surprising me. never thought that it will get to this point.
Sorry if it"s not the right place but you"re all welcome to visit my affiliate program site at http://www.affiliate-progra... .

Posted by affiliate programs at Tuesday, May 03, 2005 05:45:12

Add Comment

This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it

Buy Viagra